Advertisement

Jury deliberates in trial of Russian accused of leading Taliban attack on US

In this Friday Nov. 7, 2014 artist rendering, Irek Hamidullin, front center, his attorney Robert Wagner, front left, and interpreter Ihab Samra, front right, appear in federal court as judge Henry Hudson, left, listens in Richmond, Va. AP Photo/Dana Verkouteren

RICHMOND, Va. – An American jury was asked to decide Friday whether a Russian military veteran accused of orchestrating and leading a Taliban attack on U.S. forces in Afghanistan in 2009 be convicted in civilian court of being a terrorist.

Irek Hamidullin is charged with 15 counts, including providing material support to terrorism, trying to destroy U.S. military aircraft and conspiracy to use a weapon of mass destruction. Several of the charges are punishable by up to life in prison.

READ MORE: Kabul attacks kills at least 35, tests president’s plan for peace with Taliban

Experts have said this is a rare case of an enemy combatant being captured on the battlefield and brought to the U.S. for trial in federal court. The Obama administration is trying to show it can use the criminal court system to deal with terror suspects – a move criticized by some lawmakers who believe such cases should be handled by military tribunals.

Story continues below advertisement

Defence attorneys had tried unsuccessfully to have the indictment dismissed, arguing that Hamidullin was essentially a prisoner of war and ineligible for trial in civilian court.

Defence attorney Paul Gill renewed the argument to the jury.

“This is war – everyone talks about it, that’s what everyone has heard,” he said. “Those kinds of conflicts do not and should not come to this court.”

Prosecutors said federal law protects U.S. soldiers no matter where they are. Assistant U.S. Attorney Michael Gill said the evidence clearly shows he violated U.S. laws.

“He made confident, consistent and corroborated confessions,” Gill said in closing arguments after five days of testimony.

Hamidullin did not testify. In the recorded interviews, he talked about planning the attack but denied ever firing a shot. He told investigators he was doing “God’s work.”

The judge barred the government from using the word “terrorist” and prosecutors were not allowed to mention Osama bin Laden.

READ MORE: Casualties rising among women, children in Afghanistan’s war against Taliban: report

According to U.S. officials, Hamidullin is a Russian veteran of the Soviet war in Afghanistan who stayed in the country and joined the Haqqani Network, a Taliban-affiliated militant group. He allegedly led three groups of insurgents in a 2009 attack on Afghan border police in Khowst province.

Story continues below advertisement

When U.S. helicopters responded to the attack, prosecutors say, the insurgents tried to fire at them with anti-aircraft weapons, which malfunctioned. Hamidullin was the lone survivor among about 30 insurgents. The coalition forces sustained no casualties.

Paul Gill argued that Hamidullin only attacked Afghan border police, not U.S. helicopters, and that there was reasonable doubt that he fired his AK-47 at soldiers who arrived later to conduct a battle damage assessment. Some U.S. soldiers said they saw Hamidullin shoot, while others said they did not see him fire the weapon.

The defence attorney also said statements Hamidullin made in hours of secretly videotaped interrogations were calculated to obtain favourable treatment by his U.S. captors and avoid being turned over to the Afghans, who would have killed him.

“We know by experience that people say things that are exaggerated or untrue,” the defence attorney said.

Sponsored content

AdChoices