Advertisement

California court issues ruling about out-of-control kids

The state can remove an out-of-control child from a parent even if the parents are not to blame for the child's behavior, a California appeals court said . Solent News & Photo Agency / REX FEATURES

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — The state can remove an out-of-control child from the custody of a parent even if the mother or father is not to blame for the child’s behavior, a California appeals court said Thursday.

If children face substantial risk of harming themselves, it doesn’t matter whether the parent did anything intentional to put them in that position, the 2nd District Court of Appeal ruled.

“When a child thereby faces a substantial risk of serious physical harm, a parent’s inability to supervise or protect a child is enough by itself to invoke the juvenile court’s dependency jurisdiction,” the court said in its 3-0 ruling.

WATCH BELOW: Video shows Brampton teens fighting with a police officer

The ruling came in the case of an unnamed Los Angeles County mother whose teen daughter repeatedly ran away from home and had a child at the age of 15. The appellate court said the girl remained incorrigible despite her mother’s best efforts, which included looking for her each time she left home, sending her to live with her grandparents and calling the police and Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services for help.

Story continues below advertisement

“(The) mother in this case was neither neglectful nor blameworthy in being unable to supervise or protect her daughter,” the court said.

Breaking news from Canada and around the world sent to your email, as it happens.

But state law is clear that children can still be taken if they have suffered or are at substantial risk of suffering serious harm that a parent is unable to stop, Associate Justice Brian Hoffstadt wrote.

The court’s ruling upheld a juvenile court’s decision to assert control over the child and allow the county to place her elsewhere. The county placed her back with her grandparents.

The mother appealed the decision, and the girl turned 18 while the appeal was pending.

The court disagreed with another state appellate court that ruled in 2010 that a parent had to be shown to be culpable for a failure or inability to supervise or protect a child.

Calls to the mother’s attorney and Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services were not immediately returned.

Sponsored content

AdChoices