Advertisement

WATCH: North Okanagan water plan faces opposition

COLDSTREAM – It has been over two months since North Okanagan voters rejected the idea of borrowing up to $70 million for upgrades to the Greater Vernon Water system. Those proposed upgrades were part of a Master Water Plan that is now under fire.

READ MORE: Borrowing referendum stirs up controversy

“There was an error created some years ago when the Duteau Creek system was called upon to supply domestic water to this region,” says Terry Mooney, chair of Citizens for Change to the Master Water Plan (CCMWP).

CCMWP is arguing Duteau Creek is expensive and unsustainable as a domestic water source. They believe the utility should be less reliant on it, sourcing domestic water mainly from Kalamalka and Okanagan Lakes instead.

Story continues below advertisement

“One of the members of the council referred to this as fantasy. Well, is it fantasy when you are using a system that requires high levels of filtration? It is uncertain as to the water tables. It is uncertain as to how much water supply they can deliver,” says Mooney.

Breaking news from Canada and around the world sent to your email, as it happens.

The regional district has previously said that Kalamalka doesn’t have the capacity to provide all the needed water, and that Okanagan is the most expensive option.

Thursday the Greater Vernon Advisory Committee (GVAC) approved in principle a budget for the utility and are moving forward with a two per cent water rate increase. According to a staff report, the two per cent will increase cash reserves and provide flexibility as decisions are made about the review of the Water Master Plan.

The CCMWP doesn’t want to see further money sunk into the existing Master Water Plan until they have a chance to talk to politicians about their alternative proposal.

“We are not sure…whether [those reserves] are a slush fund for continuing on with the current agenda,” says Mooney.
Story continues below advertisement

According to GVAC chair Juliette Cunningham, the budget increase is needed no matter what happens with the Master Water Plan.

“Regardless of a Mater Water Plan [and] any of the choices we make subsequent to this, this is money that needs to be spent,” says Cunningham.

Cunningham also pointed out there will be a chance for public input on the future of the Master Water Plan.

Sponsored content

AdChoices